lizzybennet: (Default)
[personal profile] lizzybennet
  • I haven't been doing two of my classes, the metadata class and the website class. Both of them are highly technical and I just do not have the time necessary to devote to learn the skills. I'd come to the decision that I was going to drop a class and go part time, which would put me graduating a semester later than planned. However, Chris convinced me that rather than drop a class, I should simply switch classes to something easier. Yesterday I dropped the two technical classes and added "Public Libraries" and "References for Youth" instead. Both the classes seem very interesting and straightforward (and they both require that we read some literature which is awesome!) I feel much less burdened having made this change. The reason I decided on these two classes is because I've decided to change my focus from General to Youth Services. I feel really good about this change. When I began this journey I was convinced that I wanted to work in an academic setting but the further and further I progress, the more I realize that I want to work with kids. 
  • For my Public Library class I am required to read a book off the NYT Best Sellers list, something in the top 15 of any category (sans Business). The stipulation is that we pick a genre that we normally don't read. I guess this pretty much limits me to self-help or economics-type nonfiction. Yuck. I could read a popular author, like James Patterson or Nicholas Sparks. Those are authors I generally avoid in my literary snobiness, although I have read and enjoyed their work in the past. But honestly when I read the list of best sellers, I'd be likely to read any of those books. I'm greatly tempted to cheat and read something I'm very interested in, such as Margaret Atwood's newest book. The kicker is also that everyone in the class has pick a different book, and our local public library has to carry it. As I'm joining the class two weeks late, I'm sure everyone has already chosen all the good ones.
  • Chris and I went to the movies last night. We started out at "Whip it", but as it didn't grab our attention in the first few minutes, we decided to go see "Surrogates" instead. It was a nice slice of sci-fi pie. I did enjoy it but there were some unaddressed issues that I felt the film makers should have discusses. For example, if all the humans spent their whole lives laying there plugged in, why wasn't everyone fat? 

Date: 2009-10-03 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mortuus.livejournal.com
Were the humans laying there consuming many calories? Because my assumption isn't that they'd get fat but that they'd actually get gaunt just by the loss of muscle, assuming they're consuming calories sufficient to sustain them while non-mobile.

Date: 2009-10-03 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mysteena.livejournal.com
It was an issue that wasn't even addressed in the whole film. They did show humans drinking water or alcohol occasionally, but eating wasn't shown. People got up to use the bathroom, and when their surrogates returned home they unplugged. So they weren't plugged in 24/7 (usually) but they didn't ever leave their homes either. I wondered about loss of muscle as well, but like I said, it wasn't addressed. Maybe I'm just picking at details, but I would have just liked to know more about that aspect of it.

Profile

lizzybennet: (Default)
lizzybennet

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 28th, 2025 12:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios